Evaluations 101: Why Measure Prompts
The difference between benchmarks and customer evals. The four eval components: input, golden answer, output, score. Three grading approaches: human-based, code-based, model-based.
Take a real task (classification, data extraction, text generation). Create 10 test cases with golden answers. Run a baseline prompt and record the accuracy as your benchmark.
Copy and adapt to your context. Text in angle brackets should be replaced.
Help me design an eval dataset. Prompt task: <describe what the prompt should do> Sample inputs: <3-5 examples> Criteria for a correct answer: <how to define success> Suggest: 1. eval_data structure (Python dict) 2. Grading method (code/model/human) 3. Minimum accuracy threshold for production
- Test cases are too simple — the eval fails to surface edge cases.
- Too few examples (<20) — high variance in results.
- Golden answers generated by the same LLM — circular validation.
- No baseline recorded — impossible to tell if the prompt improved.